tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8729407087018325447.post324296677678494465..comments2024-03-06T14:41:16.291-05:00Comments on Kirk's UI Dev Blog: jqModal: flexible dialogsKirk Ishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15605658292036699663noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8729407087018325447.post-15635964453070702602011-10-24T14:33:30.245-04:002011-10-24T14:33:30.245-04:00I have mixed feelings about jqueryUI: it's all...I have mixed feelings about jqueryUI: it's all in one themeroller approach... I dunno, it's a little tough to maintain, because you can lose track of what components the project included and which ones it left out etc. In general I find it's less the "do one thing, do it well" and more the "one stop shopping!" that comes more naturally to other devs I know.<br /><br />Glancing at jqueryUIs, it's cool that they have the drag and drop stuff built in. <br /><br />I just wrote up a thing on FancyBox (which I've seen a lot of places)-- it might be closer to jquery UI's stuff in terms of more functionality out of the box, while jqModal seems to be concerned with not getting in your way...Kirk Ishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15605658292036699663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8729407087018325447.post-78851252923668376422011-10-24T11:58:35.466-04:002011-10-24T11:58:35.466-04:00Have you looked at jqueryUI's dialog boxes? Do...Have you looked at jqueryUI's dialog boxes? Do you like jqModal better?<br /><br />I've been using the jqueryui components because they're "more official" and more likely to be maintained, but that doesn't necessarily make them better. <br />(For sure, some of their components can definitely be frustrating, especially cross-browser)Ossianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04730023509055381022noreply@blogger.com